It's Called a "Theory" for a Reason

Yes, I'm talking about "Darwin's Theory." I am flummoxed that the Left is so apoplectic about the suggestion of another "theory" being taught in schools!!?!?!?! Yes, this argument has yet-again reared its ugly head, and the ACLU is ready at the helm to destroy every effort for such teachings.

According to a "World Peace Herald" article;

A U.S. federal judge is now being asked to decide whether a local school board acted unconstitutionally when it adopted a policy mandating that science students be told about intelligent design.

In 2004, the Dover, Pennsylvania, school board decided that students studying Darwinian evolution should be informed that there is a competing theory called intelligent design (ID).

Students are not required to learn anything about ID; they are simply told that there is a book about it in the school library, and they are
encouraged to keep an open mind.

Is it just me, or am I the only person who thinks there is nothing wrong with merely suggesting there's an opposing idea to Darwin's theory, and that the reading material is available in the school's library? Nobody in this case that I've read about suggest that it be adopted into the school curricula of Science (which, by the way, Darwinism is taught as a "proven" theory). So, why not let students know that's not the only "idea" out there? This stinks to high heaven (oops! sorry) of slamming the 1st Amendment!

The whole idea behind theories is that they are just that: "theories." They can be challenged, debated, or whatever else you want to call it, but HOLY cow (oops! my bad, sorry about the "holy" reference again)... Heaven forbid (Dang! there I go again!), anyway... you get my drift...

Just let one person, even a representative of a government school *GASP!*, propose such a thing, and the ACLU idiots get their granny-panties in a bunch! By the way, have you noticed that our Government schools (i.e., "public schools") are doing such a BANG-UP job of turning out productive members of society lately???? Didn't think so...

Again, the ACLU just couldn't resist this opportunity to get into the limelight...

This was too much for the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), which brought suit to have the Dover policy declared unconstitutional.

Some people are now comparing the 2005 Dover trial to the 1925 Scopes trial, in which the ACLU defended a teacher named John Scopes who had been accused of violating a state law prohibiting public schools from teaching that humans are descended from lower forms of life.

But there is a huge difference between the two: In 1925 the ACLU went to court to permit the teaching of Darwinian evolution; now, the ACLU is suing to prohibit the teaching of anything but Darwinian evolution.

This article is a MUST read and a wake-up call to all. Everybody should do their homework on Darwinism, and come to terms with what it really is - a theory.

Now, the only case that I can think of that MIGHT prove Darwinism resides in the Senate House in the great state of Massachussetts, and is reported to be a VERY good swimmer!

This was a production of Stop The ACLU Blogburst. If you would like to join us, please register at Our Portal. You will be added to our mailing list and blogroll. Over 115 blogs already onboard.

Join us in this fight! Help us battle the ACLU, and sign the petitions NOW!
You can sign both petitions here