The "Ronnie Earle" Movie - Coming Soon!

Well, isn't this just special? "Ronnie Earle has given a film crew "extraordinary access" to make a motion picture about his work on the case." If ever I've seen motive, this is it! And it should send up red flags to everybody, but not to the Libs. This fits right along with their playbook rules; If you can't get Bush, go at everybody and anybody else who can "hurt" the Republican party!

Democrats would call this "freedom of expression," but what about their views of the horrific idea of "capitalism?" (You don't think that Ronnie Earle would be involved in this movie for free now, do you?) Now that Tom DeLay is out and about defending himself, and rightfully telling the truth about the history of Earle's mission in life to "get DeLay," why are the Libs still screaming about him? I seem to remember a little matter of some Classified Intelligence Documents winding up in the trousers, socks, and elsewhere of Sandy "Pants" Berger! Did we hear anything from the Left about that blatant criminal offense? Well, no we didn't. In fact, I find it suspiciously amazing that now the ABLE Danger group is coming out, it's starting to shed a little light on Berger's possible motives for being in there, taking those unknown documents and admitting to destroying them, JUST before the "9/11 Commission" hearings. But, did we ever hear much about THAT in the MSM? No, we didn't; except that he lost his security clearance for a while. We all know this because there are two sets of rules: One for the Republicans, and an entirely different set for the Democrats!

This conspiracy charge against Tom DeLay is nothing but monkey business on the part of Ronnie Earle. The indictment CLEARLY gives no factual evidence of criminal intent on DeLay's part, and criminal intent MUST be proved in a court of law! But, OH the Left is reveling in this as if they've found leverage for the '06 elections! This ain't gonna happen, folks. Might this be their "holy grail" for which they've long hoped for since they lost their bid to oust Karl Rove or smear Dick Cheney? Probably not. These conspiracy allegations are based on what he could have done, might have done, but don't really know if he DID do. Conspiracy merely says that someone might have been a part of a criminal enterprise, but criminal intent MUST be proven by the prosecutor; theft of secret documents is an undisputed criminal offense!

As Byron York points out:

"The film, according to the description, "follows maverick Austin DA Ronnie Earle's investigation into what really happened when corporate money joined forces with relentless political ambitions to help swing the pivotal 2002 Texas elections, cementing Republican control from Austin to Washington DC."

"We approached him [Earle], and he offered us extraordinary access to him and, to an extent, to his staff," Birnbaum told National Review Online Thursday. "We've been shooting for about two years."

Now, knowing that Earle has long been aware as of what his intentions were for the future (to get DeLay). Would you expect anything less than allowing a film crew to follow you on your "life's mission?" Of course not. Will this movie get any play? Probably not, because it could reveal Earle's exact motive for pursuing DeLay in the first place.

Again, what we have here in a vehement hatred for the Republican party, and an immense desire to do ANYTHING to "hurt Bush." I wonder if this just means that Hollyweird has realized that they can't sway public opinion by their political rantings, so now they've had to resort back to the older standard.. ."MAKE A MOVIE ABOUT IT and call it a documentary!"

Oh, and did I mention the name of the movie? It's called "The Big Buy." I could think of MANY more politicians, including Clinton, sKerry, Gov. Blanco, and a cast of a thousand others to which this would more aptly apply. Good thing we know going in who this movie is "about." Otherwise, we might make incorrect but appropriate assumptions.

Can you say "Would you like to spend the night in the Lincoln Bedroom? Really, it won't cost THAT much and it IS nice!!" That depends on what your definition of "is" is.